<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>qrisper &#187; social network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.qrisper.com/tag/social-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.qrisper.com</link>
	<description>the making of qrisper.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Only people with large social networks can get good answers</title>
		<link>http://blog.qrisper.com/2009/07/only-people-with-large-social-networks-can-get-good-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qrisper.com/2009/07/only-people-with-large-social-networks-can-get-good-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jung Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qrisper.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the growth of social everything, you hear this more and more: recommendations are better from your friends; your followers can provide better answers; tap into that social graph&#8217;s fat ass.  Ok the last one I made up but you get the idea.  There are a number of issues with limiting yourself and your questions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the growth of social everything, you hear this more and more: recommendations are better from your friends; your followers can provide better answers; tap into that social graph&#8217;s fat ass.  Ok the last one I made up but you get the idea.  There are a number of issues with limiting yourself and your questions to your social graph.  Let&#8217;s use <a title="aardvark" href="http://vark.com/">Aardvark</a>, another question and answer company that <a title="techcrunch aardvark" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/07/you-put-your-aardvark-in-my-twitter-bonus-interview-with-founders/">Techcrunch</a> posted about as an example.</p>
<p>My understanding of how Aardvard  differentiates themselves from their competitors is that when you ask a question, Vark will dive into the profiles of your friends and their friends to find people that will most likely be able to answer your question  within 5 minutes.  <a title="battelle aardvark" href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/004886.php">John Battelle&#8217;s spidey sense</a> went off the charts for this company.  Mine is going off too&#8230;albeit for different reasons.</p>
<p>The first assumption that Vard is making is that the answers you get from your social graph are better than anything else available to you.  Two questions: why is it better and what if your social graph isn&#8217;t that big or it&#8217;s actually very big?  Example: Ashton Kutcher (with 2 million followers) and Joe Bloggs (with 126 followers) asks for recommendations for some really good mutter paneer in NYC.  Will either of them get a better answer than searching Google for &#8220;best mutter paneer nyc&#8221;?  (I&#8217;d recommend Haveli)</p>
<p>Basically your answers are limited to the extent of your social graph.  So the more popular you are, the better answers you&#8217;ll get.  Well, I&#8217;m screwed.</p>
<p>The second assumption is that their answers are so good that you&#8217;re willing to wait, on average, 5 minutes to get an answer.  5 minutes in internet time is like 5 billion years.  If I&#8217;m on the street with a bunch of friends, looking for a good Indian restaurant, here&#8217;s the conversation that I&#8217;m likely to have.</p>
<p><strong>Me</strong>: Hey guys, I&#8217;m really jonesing for some peas and cheese in a savory curry.  Do you know a place?<br />
<strong>Friend 1</strong>: Nope.<br />
<strong>Friend 2</strong>: Nope but I&#8217;m on aardvark.com!  Let&#8217;s ask there.<br />
<strong>Friend 3</strong>: Isn&#8217;t it Vark.com?<br />
<strong>Me</strong>: I think it&#8217;s aardvark&#8230;isn&#8217;t it?<br />
<strong>Friend 1</strong>: It&#8217;s aardvard like Haarvard.<br />
<strong>Friend 2</strong>: Dude, you&#8217;re useless.  I just sent the question&#8230;just have to wait 5 minutes for an answer.<br />
<strong>Friend 3</strong>: What?! 5 minutes?! Dude, 5 minutes is like 5 billion years in internet time!<br />
<strong>Me</strong>: Yeah and don&#8217;t you only have like 50 followers on Twitter?<br />
<strong>Friend 1</strong>: That&#8217;s you dumbass.<br />
<strong>Friend 2</strong>: Better than asking qrisper.com.  What do you have like 50 users now?<br />
<strong>Friend 3</strong>: Oooh burnnn!<br />
<strong>Me</strong>: I haven&#8217;t launched yet!<br />
<strong>Friend 1</strong>: I&#8217;ll  try Hunch while we&#8217;re waiting.  I hear they&#8217;re good at helping us make decisions.<br />
<strong>Friend 2</strong>: Yeah, only after answering questions like, &#8220;Are you menstruating right now?&#8221;<br />
<strong>Me</strong>: Screw this. (types mutter paneer nyc into Google/Yelp/Urbanspoon/etc., gets an answer in 0.09 seconds).  Let&#8217;s go here.<br />
<em>(5 minutes later)</em><br />
<strong>Friend 2</strong>: Hey, vardvark&#8217;s saying we should go to where we are now.<br />
<strong>Me</strong>: <em>(muttering)</em> I haven&#8217;t launched yet is all&#8230;</p>
<p>While I can see people using Vark to complement a web search for answers, it won&#8217;t replace it.  The criticisms for sites like  Yahoo Answers are valid, but intentionally limiting your answer pool to your personal social network isn&#8217;t the answer either.  Targeted social networks, such as <a title="stack overflow" href="http://stackoverflow.com">Stack Overflow</a> and <a title="chowhound" href="http://chowhound.chow.com">Chowhound</a> are doing a better job of providing answers.  But they aren&#8217;t the be all, end all.  That would be qrisper.</p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.qrisper.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fonly-people-with-large-social-networks-can-get-good-answers%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.qrisper.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fonly-people-with-large-social-networks-can-get-good-answers%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qrisper.com/2009/07/only-people-with-large-social-networks-can-get-good-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.214 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-10-04 11:16:14 -->
